Metabolism · Growth · Fibonacci

Metabolic Scaling, Growth and Fibonacci-Based Models

Research on body mass, metabolism, ontogenetic growth and Fibonacci dynamics.

This research line investigates how body mass, metabolism and organismal growth can be related through mathematical models, with particular emphasis on the metabolic scaling exponent and a developmental variable associated with the golden ratio.

\[M\longrightarrow n\longrightarrow b(n)\longrightarrow B\]

Metabolic Scaling

A classical relationship describes metabolic rate \(B\) as a function of body mass \(M\):

\[B=B_0M^b\]

where \(B_0\) is a normalization constant and \(b\) is the metabolic scaling exponent.

Central question: must the metabolic exponent remain constant throughout an organism's growth?

Fibonacci Dynamics

The golden ratio is

\[\varphi=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\]

Body mass can be represented approximately as

\[M(n)\sim M_0\varphi^n\]

and therefore

\[n=\log_\varphi\left(\frac{M}{M_0}\right)\]

In this interpretation, \(n\) acts as a variable associated with developmental stage.

\[b=b(n)\]

Metabolic Scaling from Fibonacci Dynamics

Dorilson Cambui · Acta Biotheoretica, 74, Article 18 (2026).

\[b(n)=\frac{(n-1)\ln\varphi-\ln\sqrt{5}}{n\ln\varphi-\ln\sqrt{5}}\]

For sufficiently large values of \(n\),

\[b(n)\approx\frac{n-1}{n}\]

Article graph

Comparison between the empirical range of the metabolic scaling exponent, the approximation \( b(n) = \frac{n-1}{n} \), the refined expression and the classical WBE value \( b = 0.75 \).

Graph from the article Metabolic Scaling From Fibonacci Dynamics showing b(n) as a function of growth stage n

Figure included as a visual highlight of the article Metabolic Scaling From Fibonacci Dynamics.

Preprint · arXiv

Ontogenetic Growth: A Fibonacci-Based Ontogenetic Discretization of Body-Mass Growth Trajectories

In this work, the Fibonacci-based idea is extended from metabolic scaling to body-mass growth trajectories. Biological growth remains a continuous process; the discretization is applied to the ontogenetic coordinate used to represent development, rather than directly to body mass.

The continuous description begins with the relation between body mass and the ontogenetic coordinate:

\[m(t)=m_0\varphi^{n(t)}\]

One possible saturating dynamics for this coordinate is

\[n(t)=n_\infty\left[1-\exp\left(-k(t-t_0)\right)\right]\]

The formulation starts from a continuous coordinate \(n(t)\) and a discretized version divided into small substages. When the resolution \(\Delta n\) is small, the discretized trajectory approaches the continuous curve. The visible steps should therefore be interpreted as a finite-resolution representation of developmental progression, not as real biological jumps in body mass.

Main result: the Fibonacci-based formulation reproduced the general shape of the growth trajectories for guinea pig, guppy, hen and cow. In the quantitative comparison, the Fibonacci formulation was favored in two of the four cases (Guppy and Hen), whereas the WBE model was favored for Guinea pig and Cow. Even in those cases, the Fibonacci curves closely followed the empirical growth patterns.

Growth-trajectory visualization

The GIFs below illustrate, across organisms with very different body-mass and developmental time scales, how the Fibonacci-based discretized description can follow the continuous growth trajectory as the ontogenetic resolution is refined.

Guinea pig growth GIF comparing observed data, WBE and Fibonacci discretization
Guinea pig. Comparison between observed data, the continuous reference curve and the Fibonacci-based ontogenetic discretization.
Guppy growth GIF comparing observed data, WBE and Fibonacci discretization
Guppy. A small-body-mass example showing the discretized representation approaching the continuous trajectory.
Hen growth GIF comparing observed data, WBE and Fibonacci discretization
Hen. The discretization represents progression through ontogenetic substages without implying real jumps in body mass.
Cow growth GIF comparing observed data, WBE and Fibonacci discretization
Cow. The same formalism is applied to a trajectory with much larger body mass and growth time.

The aim is not to replace classical growth models universally, but to provide an alternative ontogenetic coordinate for organizing and analyzing growth trajectories across biological systems.

Discrete Ontogenetic States

\[j=0,1,2,\ldots,J_\max\]
\[m_j=m_\mathrm{ref}\varphi^{j\Delta n}\]
\[m_0\rightarrow m_1\rightarrow m_2\rightarrow\cdots\rightarrow m_{J_\max}\]

In the continuous limit,

\[\frac{dm}{dt}=m\ln(\varphi)\,v(n,t)\]

Why Fibonacci?

For sufficiently large values of \(n\), Fibonacci numbers satisfy approximately

\[F_n\approx\frac{\varphi^n}{\sqrt{5}}\]

The golden ratio therefore provides a simple mathematical structure for constructing a sequence of scales and testing quantitative relationships between metabolism and growth.

\[\text{Metabolism}\longleftrightarrow\text{Body Mass}\longleftrightarrow\text{Growth}\longleftrightarrow\text{Development}\]